Comparing and contrasting Achilles and other warriors Essay

Comparing and contrasting Achilles and former(a) warriorsIntroduction Achilles is one of the main fictitious denotations in Homers Iliad. Iliad is a known epic covering the formative eld of Roman and Greek mythology. Iliad pursue glory, heroism, and screw within the authority and influence of eldritch powers. Achilles possessed heroic strength and in like manner had close contact with the gods. Achilles had all the qualities of a grand warrior and he proved to be the most dominant man among the Achaean army. However his deeply rooted character barred his efficiency to act with faithfulness and nobility. The rationale of this paper is to analyze the character of Achilles and examine how he was akin of differed from opposite heroic warriors. Achilles could not manage his self-exaltation or the fury that came about when his overcharge was injured. These attri b arlyes greatly touch on Achilles life since he abandoned his fellow warriors because he had been insulted in ad vance Agamemnon, his commander. Achilles even wished his fellow warriors to be killed by Trojan warriors. He was driven by thirst for glory and was willing to break anything for his reputation. Achilles had extreme temper for example, though the demise of Patroclus provoked him to reconcile with Agamemnon, this did not salvage his fury tho he tell his anger to Hector (Homer, 1990, p. 32). Achilles forfeited twelve Trojan men at the funeral of Patroclus, he also killed his opponents mercilessly and shamefully vandalized the mud of Hector. These events grass Achilles great anger because he was mourning the dying of Patroclus. Achilles pride, bloodlust and wrath affected him adversely (Virgil, 2006, p. 42). Achilles is recognized as the great warrior in Achaian army and no early(a) warrior could match him as a fighter. Achilles has a great sense of social pose because he fixed to act during the afflict that was consuming the soldiers at Achaian camp. Agamemnon, Achilles lovely did not act so Achilles decided to find out the cause of the blight by calling for a gathering of the entire army. Achilles is argumentative and petulant because he argues that though Agamemnon gets the best prizes from war, he never worked for them. In the course of argument, Achilles almost killed Agamemnon, though he was saved from carrying out the flagitious act by goddess Athena. Achilles believed that the quarrel betwixt him and the king was righteous and alike as the war a put one overst Trojan army. Achilles major diagnostic was excessive pride because he remained raging even by and by(prenominal) Agamemnon promise to beget Briseis alongside former(a) gifts (Vigil, 2006, p. 47). Gilgamesh is a warrior who fears close throughout George XIII epic. Achilles on the other hand is also very raw with his metaphoric wickedness that displace notwithstanding take place after the death of his earthly life. Gilgamesh and Achilles arouse a freshet of similarities, which include dynamic attitude on death and life centered. They have similar attitudes especially when their heroic comrades died. The death of Patroclus stirred Achilles very much whereas the death of Enkidu also caused much distress to Gilgamesh. Achilles and Gilgamesh ar dickens semi-divine heroes who have mixed matching characteristics and life-events, and they cogitate a lot with their lethal lives, in force(p) not relatively in the same approach. Achilles and Gilgamesh share funda intellectual similarities in their mortal lives. Each of them is a child of a goddess and a mortal man who happens to be a king. Achilles is a son of Thetis and has an olympian rapport which enables him to speak with the gods with the help of Thetis (Homer, 1990, p 27). Gilgamesh on the other hand is regarded as one third human and cardinal third god, which makes him to stand out as an exceptional character that exists in relationships with both the mortal world and divine world. Iliad rela tes the differentiation of Achilles and Gilgamesh in battle where they reveal themselves as headstrong warriors. Neither Achilles nor Gilgamesh is c erstrned with sentimentalist and family relationships. The major relationship these epic heroes have is with their mothers, where they seek protection and guidance. Through this rapport, they are able to gain development and wisdom. Achilles can also be compared to other heroes such as Aenes since their lives is determined by superhuman powers. In the book Iliad and Aeneid, Achilles and Aenes are characters who reveal their chivalry and bravely. In the books, Aenes and Achilles are elect by gods and favored in various periods of their lives (Homer, 1990, p.26). These characters have predestinate death and fate, they are sons of gods and they have specific accomplishment and complaint in their lives. The major difference between Achilles and Gilgamesh is on anger management. Even after the death of his friend Enkidu, Gilgamesh remai ns calm down and does not translate his fury to anyone, nevertheless Achilles anger could not be controlled after the death of Patroclus. Gilgamesh mourns the death of his friend by ritually pulling his clothes and hair, but Achilles mourns the death of Patroclaus by killing some(prenominal) Trojan warriors. An in depth digest of the epics of the era reveal contrasting features of the heroes. The circumstance, the physical features and situation might be similar, but the discrepancy is mainly due to mental and intellect framework of the heroes. Aenes fought major battles just like Achilles, but their fate was different. Achilles was predestinate to die in the battle, while Aenes was predestined to be an architect of a massive town in the planet. Achilles was more of a cruel enemy and fierce warrior and his childbed was to wrestle and triumph over bloody(a) wars. On the other hand, Aenes was more cultivate and constructive in comparison to imperious Achilles. Achilles is v iolent, stubborn, ruthless and hostile and had a capacity to kill Trojan warriors ruthlessly in the battlefield. Achilles battle and attack intended abundant massacre. On contrary, Aenes is more placid and sober. Aenes as a warrior had adorable features of restraint, chastity, discipline and love. He was a true leader who never left his comrades. Aenes led the warriors to pursue novel home and new culture. He was a fighter, but not even once did he display emotions and power in arbitrary and cruel manner (Vigil, 2006, p. 74). In conclusion, Achilles was a great warrior, but he was a merciless fighter who killed some(prenominal) Trojan warriors. Achilles shared similar features with other heroes in the epics. These heroes fate was usually predestined and they were mostly sons of gods. They sought advice from their mothers which helped them to develop and gain wisdom. However, an in depth analysis on the character of these heroes depict that there are some differences. Achilles was a violent warrior as compared to most heroes who were able to manage their fury. In addition, Achilles, Aenes and Gilgamesh were heroes of their times.ReferencesHomer, Robert Fagles, and Bernard Knox. The Iliad. untried York Viking,1990. Print.Hope Nash Wolff. Gilgamesh, Enkidu, and the Heroic Life. diary of the American Oriental Society 89.2(1969) 392-398. Web.Virgil, R. Fagles, B. Knox, and S. Callow. The Aeneid. New York Penguin Audio,2006. Print.Source document